Hime v. Shulkin
This text of Hime v. Shulkin (Hime v. Shulkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
RICHARD B. HIME, Claimant-Appellant
v.
DAVID J. SHULKIN, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________
2016-2123 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 14-3215, Judge Alan G. Lance Sr., Judge Coral Wong Pietsch, Judge Margaret C. Bartley. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
SANDRA WALDORF WISCHOW, Goodman Allen Donnelly PLLC, Glen Allen, VA, argued for claimant-appellant. Also represented by ERIN ELIZABETH RALSTON.
ADAM E. LYONS, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washing- ton, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR., L. MISHA PREHEIM; AMANDA BLACKMON, Y. KEN LEE, Office of General Counsel, De- partment of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 20, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hime v. Shulkin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hime-v-shulkin-cafc-2017.