Himark Enterprises, Inc. v. Heartland Industrial Park

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Himark Enterprises, Inc. v. Heartland Industrial Park

130 A.D.2d 622, 515 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46637

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 130 A.D.2d 622 (Himark Enterprises, Inc. v. Heartland Industrial Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Himark Enterprises, Inc. v. Heartland Industrial Park, 130 A.D.2d 622, 515 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for the allegedly unreasonable refusal to consent to a sublease of certain property, and a proceeding to recover possession of the subject property, Heartland Industrial Park, a partnership, appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 14, 1985, as, after a nonjury trial, and upon declaring that its refusal to consent to the sublease of the premises from the respondent Himark Enterprises, Inc., to Bay Shore Moving & Storage, Inc., was unreasonable, is in favor of the respondent Himark Enterprises, Inc., and against the appellant Heartland Industrial Park in the principal amount of $73,333.30, and dismisses the appellant’s counterclaims and cross claim.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Gerard at the Supreme Court, Suffolk County. Mangano, J. P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for the allegedly unreasonable refusal to consent to a sublease of certain property, and a proceeding to recover possession of the subject property, Heartland Industrial Park, a partnership, appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated November 14, 1985, as, after a nonjury trial, and upon declaring that its refusal to consent to the sublease of the premises from the respondent Himark Enterprises, Inc., to Bay Shore Moving & Storage, Inc., was unreasonable, is in favor of the respondent Himark Enterprises, Inc., and against the appellant Heartland Industrial Park in the principal amount of $73,333.30, and dismisses the appellant’s counterclaims and cross claim.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Gerard at the Supreme Court, Suffolk County. Mangano, J. P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 A.D.2d 622, 515 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/himark-enterprises-inc-v-heartland-industrial-park-nyappdiv-1987.