Himani v. Gonzales

207 F. App'x 450
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 29, 2006
Docket05-61092
StatusUnpublished

This text of 207 F. App'x 450 (Himani v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Himani v. Gonzales, 207 F. App'x 450 (5th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Sultan Ali Himani and Shaheen Himani seek review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that dismissed their appeal of the immigration judge’s denial of their claim for withholding of removal.

A petition for review must be filed not later than 30 days after the date of the final order of removal. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1). The 30-day deadline began to run in this case on October 25, 2005, when the BIA issued its decision and wrote a letter to counsel notifying him of the decision. See Karimian-Kaklaki v. INS, 997 F.2d 108, 110-11 (5th Cir.1993). The deadline expired on November 24, 2005. The petition for review, filed on November 28, 2005, was filed after the expiration of the deadline. See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995); Navarro-Miranda v. Ashcroft, 330 F.3d 672, 676 (5th Cir.2003); but see Eberhart v. United States, 546 U.S. 12, 126 S.Ct. 403, 163 L.Ed.2d 14 (2005)(distinguishing between filing deadlines that are claim-processing rules and those that are rules governing subject-matter jurisdiction).

PETITION DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Navarro-Miranda v. Ashcroft
330 F.3d 672 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
514 U.S. 386 (Supreme Court, 1995)
Eberhart v. United States
546 U.S. 12 (Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 F. App'x 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/himani-v-gonzales-ca5-2006.