Hiltz v. Williams
45 N.E. 762, 167 Mass. 454, 1897 Mass. LEXIS 365
Opinion
By the Court. There was evidence that the defendant employed the plaintiff to sell the land, and that the plaintiff, in pursuance of this employment, called Foster’s attention to the land, and had some talk with him about purchasing it. It was competent for the court trying the case without a jury to infer from the evidence that Foster ultimately purchased the land in consequence of the efforts of the plaintiff to sell it.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hiltz v. Williams, 45 N.E. 762, 167 Mass. 454, 1897 Mass. LEXIS 365 (Mass. 1897).
45 N.E. 762 (Hiltz v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Waters v. Pacific Wool Products Co.
167 N.E. 256 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)
Stuart v. Valsom
143 N.E. 815 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)
Morrison v. Hall
96 A. 298 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1915)
Bell v. Siemens & Halske Electric Co.
77 N.W. 152 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1898)