Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission

411 S.E.2d 424, 306 S.C. 260, 1990 S.C. LEXIS 222
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided July 20, 1990·No. 90-MO-213·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Affirmed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 23 and under the authority of Freeman v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission, 302 S.C. 51, 393 S.E. (2d) 383 (1990) (a suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) may not be maintained against this state in state courts).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission, 411 S.E.2d 424, 306 S.C. 260, 1990 S.C. LEXIS 222 (S.C. 1990).

411 S.E.2d 424 (Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Freeman v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission
393 S.E.2d 383 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1990)