Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission

411 S.E.2d 424, 306 S.C. 260, 1990 S.C. LEXIS 222
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 20, 1990
Docket90-MO-213
StatusPublished

This text of 411 S.E.2d 424 (Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission, 411 S.E.2d 424, 306 S.C. 260, 1990 S.C. LEXIS 222 (S.C. 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Affirmed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 23 and under the authority of Freeman v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission, 302 S.C. 51, 393 S.E. (2d) 383 (1990) (a suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) may not be maintained against this state in state courts).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freeman v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission
393 S.E.2d 383 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
411 S.E.2d 424, 306 S.C. 260, 1990 S.C. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilton-v-south-carolina-public-railways-commission-sc-1990.