Hilton v. Clements

291 N.W. 483, 138 Neb. 143
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hilton v. Clements. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 Neb. 791
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 1940·No. No. 30648·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant Guy L. Clements has filed a motion for a rehearing in this case. The opinion heretofore filed herein on March 29, 1940 (137 Neb. 791, 291 N. W. 483) is modified so that the last sentence thereof shall read as follows:

“In addition thereto, equity and good conscience require that the executor account to the district court for such distributive share of William H. Berger, and, upon failure to do so, judgment shall be rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the executor personally for an amount equal to the amount due on plaintiff’s judgment including accrued interest and costs, but in no event in an amount in excess of the distributive share of William H. Berger in the estate of George L. Berger, deceased.”

As so modified, the opinion is affirmed and the motion for a rehearing

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hilton v. Clements, 291 N.W. 483, 138 Neb. 143 (Neb. 1940).

291 N.W. 483 (Hilton v. Clements) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hilton v. Clements
291 N.W. 483 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1940)