Hilton Pittman v. Inter National Bank
This text of Hilton Pittman v. Inter National Bank (Hilton Pittman v. Inter National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-07-00480-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG _________________________________________________________
HILTON PITTMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
INTER NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE.
________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 275th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Hilton Pittman, and appellee, Inter National Bank, have filed a joint
motion to dismiss this appeal. According to the motion, the parties have reached a
settlement regarding the matters at issue in this appeal, and accordingly, desire to dismiss
the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss
the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX . R. APP . P.
42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is hereby
DISMISSED. Pursuant to agreement between the parties, costs will be borne by the party
incurring same. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court
will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request,
no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 13th day of March, 2008.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hilton Pittman v. Inter National Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilton-pittman-v-inter-national-bank-texapp-2008.