Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co. v. Clements
This text of 33 S.E. 951 (Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co. v. Clements) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. On the trial of a claim case involving title to personal property levied on under a fi. fa., when the claimant has given a forthcoming bond for the property actually seized by the officer executing the fi. fa., it is not error for the judge to refuse to dismiss the levy on the ground that the entry thereof on the fi. fa. does not sufficiently describe the property. Cohen v. Broughton, 54 Ga. 296; Crine v. Tifts & Co., 66 Ga. 644.
2. The verdict was not without evidence to support it.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 S.E. 951, 108 Ga. 791, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 423, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilton-dodge-lumber-co-v-clements-ga-1899.