Hilton-Dodge Lumber Co. v. Alwood

86 S.E. 221, 144 Ga. 107, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 77
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hilton-Dodge Lumber Co. v. Alwood. Read the opinion of the Court — 141 Ga. 653
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 17, 1915·Published

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The bill of exceptions in this ease does not purport to assign error upon any final judgment, or upon any judgment granted at any hearing involving the grant or refusal of an interlocutory injunction. The assignment of error is merely upon what is termed in the bill of exceptions “an ex parte order revoking the restraining order in said cause.” Being of such character, the-order was not subject to review by “fast writ of, error.” Watterson v. Stubbs, 135 Ga. 368 (69 S. E. 487).

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hilton-Dodge Lumber Co. v. Alwood, 86 S.E. 221, 144 Ga. 107, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 77 (Ga. 1915).

86 S.E. 221 (Hilton-Dodge Lumber Co. v. Alwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watterson v. Stubbs & Hodges
69 S.E. 487 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)