Hilt v. Sheriff
This text of 513 P.2d 442 (Hilt v. Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
In this appeal from an order denying pre-trial habeas relief, appellant, charged with murder (NRS 200.010), contends that the evidence adduced before the magistrate failed to establish probable cause to hold him for trial.
Contrary to appellant’s contention the record before us is sufficient to show that “there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed and that the [appellant] has committed it, . . .” NRS 171.206. At this stage of the proceedings we are not concerned that “[t]he evidence of commission of the offense charged may not support a conviction . . .” Maskaly v. State, 85 Nev. 111, 450 P.2d 790 (1969).
The order of the trial court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
513 P.2d 442, 89 Nev. 337, 1973 Nev. LEXIS 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilt-v-sheriff-nev-1973.