Hilstrom v. State

923 S.W.2d 874, 325 Ark. 317, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 418
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided July 8, 1996·No. CR 96-563·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On June 3, 1996, a motion by appellant for rule on clerk was denied because the attorney for appellant, James O. Cox, did not admit fault. The appellant’s attorney was given thirty days from the date of the per curiam to file a motion and affidavit accepting full responsibility for not timely filing the transcript. Appellant, Keith Cox Hilstrom, by his attorney, James O. Cox, has filed a second motion for rule on the clerk. In this motion, his attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 295 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this per curiam will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hilstrom v. State, 923 S.W.2d 874, 325 Ark. 317, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 418 (Ark. 1996).

923 S.W.2d 874 (Hilstrom v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)