Hilsman v. Hilsman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hilsman v. Hilsman

438 So. 2d 880, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24476

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 14, 1983·No. No. 82-638·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on the authority of Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980), we affirm the final judgment of dissolution in all respects except for the provision which requires the former husband to maintain life insurance for the benefit of each child “during the child’s minority and through college.” (Emphasis supplied). On remand, we direct the trial court to delete the phrase, “and through college.” See Blum v. Blum, 382 So.2d 52 (Fla.3d DCA 1980); Kern v. Kern, 360 So.2d 482 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

ANSTEAD, C.J., HURLEY, J., and WES-SEL, JOHN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based on the authority of Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980), we affirm the final judgment of dissolution in all respects except for the provision which requires the former husband to maintain life insurance for the benefit of each child “during the child’s minority and through college.” (Emphasis supplied). On remand, we direct the trial court to delete the phrase, “and through college.” See Blum v. Blum, 382 So.2d 52 (Fla.3d DCA 1980); Kern v. Kern, 360 So.2d 482 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

ANSTEAD, C.J., HURLEY, J., and WES-SEL, JOHN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Hilsman v. Hilsman, 438 So. 2d 880, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24476 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

438 So. 2d 880 (Hilsman v. Hilsman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related