Hilsenroth v. Burstyn

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hilsenroth v. Burstyn

432 So. 2d 640, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 29075

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 1, 1983

DocketNo. 82-1493

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 432 So. 2d 640 (Hilsenroth v. Burstyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hilsenroth v. Burstyn, 432 So. 2d 640, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 29075 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

GLICKSTEIN, Judge.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order denying his motion to disqualify the attorney for appellees. The appropriate appellate procedure in such matter is a petition for writ of certiorari. See Andrews v. Allstate Insurance Co., 366 So.2d 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); DeArce v. State, 405 So.2d 283 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Beth S. v. Grant Associates, Inc., 426 So.2d 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stansbury, 374 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 5th DCA 1979). We consider this appeal as such a petition.

Procedural due process having been accorded and there being no departure from the essential requirements of law on the part of the trial court, the petition is denied.

BERANEK, J., and SMITH, RUPERT, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GLICKSTEIN, Judge.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order denying his motion to disqualify the attorney for appellees. The appropriate appellate procedure in such matter is a petition for writ of certiorari. See Andrews v. Allstate Insurance Co., 366 So.2d 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); DeArce v. State, 405 So.2d 283 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Beth S. v. Grant Associates, Inc., 426 So.2d 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stansbury, 374 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 5th DCA 1979). We consider this appeal as such a petition.

Procedural due process having been accorded and there being no departure from the essential requirements of law on the part of the trial court, the petition is denied.

BERANEK, J., and SMITH, RUPERT, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

432 So. 2d 640, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 29075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilsenroth-v-burstyn-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack