Hilsenroth v. Burstyn
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of an order denying his motion to disqualify the attorney for appellees. The appropriate appellate procedure in such matter is a petition for writ of certiorari. See Andrews v. Allstate Insurance Co., 366 So.2d 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); DeArce v. State, 405 So.2d 283 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Beth S. v. Grant Associates, Inc., 426 So.2d 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stansbury, 374 So.2d 1051 (Fla. 5th DCA 1979). We consider this appeal as such a petition.
Procedural due process having been accorded and there being no departure from the essential requirements of law on the part of the trial court, the petition is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
432 So. 2d 640 (Hilsenroth v. Burstyn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.