Hillyer v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Hillyer v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

1998 Ohio 231, 82 Ohio St. 3d 386

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 22, 1998

Docket1997-2143

StatusPublished

This text of 1998 Ohio 231 (Hillyer v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hillyer v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 1998 Ohio 231, 82 Ohio St. 3d 386 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 386.]

HILLYER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Hillyer v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 1998-Ohio-231.] Motor vehicles—Insurance—Scope of coverage of an underinsured motorist claim—Statutory law in effect at time of entering into contract for automobile liability insurance controls the rights and duties of the contracting parties. (No. 97-2143—Submitted June 24, 1998—Decided July 22, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 71724. __________________ Friedman, Domiano & Smith Co., L.P.A., and Jeffrey H. Friedman, for appellants. Meyers, Hentemann & Rea Co., L.P.A., and Henry A. Hentemann, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Ross v. Farmers Ins. Group of Cos. (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 281, 695 N.E.2d 732. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion to Ross v. Farmers Ins. Group of Cos. (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 281, 291, 695 N.E.2d 732, I respectfully dissent. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 386.]

HILLYER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Hillyer v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 1998-Ohio-231.] Motor vehicles—Insurance—Scope of coverage of an underinsured motorist claim—Statutory law in effect at time of entering into contract for automobile liability insurance controls the rights and duties of the contracting parties. (No. 97-2143—Submitted June 24, 1998—Decided July 22, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 71724. __________________ Friedman, Domiano & Smith Co., L.P.A., and Jeffrey H. Friedman, for appellants. Meyers, Hentemann & Rea Co., L.P.A., and Henry A. Hentemann, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Ross v. Farmers Ins. Group of Cos. (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 281, 695 N.E.2d 732. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion to Ross v. Farmers Ins. Group of Cos. (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 281, 291, 695 N.E.2d 732, I respectfully dissent. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Ohio 231, 82 Ohio St. 3d 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillyer-v-state-farm-mut-auto-ins-co-ohio-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack