Hillyer v. State Farm Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Hillyer v. State Farm Ins. Co.

1999 Ohio 240, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1205

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 13, 1999

Docket1998-1607

StatusPublished

This text of 1999 Ohio 240 (Hillyer v. State Farm Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hillyer v. State Farm Ins. Co., 1999 Ohio 240, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1205 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 1205.]

HILLYER, APPELLANT, v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Hillyer v. State Farm Ins. Co., 1999-Ohio-240.] AppeaL dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 98-1607—Submitted September 15, 1999—Decided October 13, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 97-L-031. __________________ Friedman, Domiano & Smith Co., L.P.A., Jeffrey H. Friedman and Stephen S. Vanek, for appellant. Meyers, Hentemann & Rea Co., L.P.A., and Henry A. Hentemann, for appellee. Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A., and Todd O. Rosenberg, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. COOK, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 1205.]

HILLYER, APPELLANT, v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as Hillyer v. State Farm Ins. Co., 1999-Ohio-240.] AppeaL dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 98-1607—Submitted September 15, 1999—Decided October 13, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lake County, No. 97-L-031. __________________ Friedman, Domiano & Smith Co., L.P.A., Jeffrey H. Friedman and Stephen S. Vanek, for appellant. Meyers, Hentemann & Rea Co., L.P.A., and Henry A. Hentemann, for appellee. Elk & Elk Co., L.P.A., and Todd O. Rosenberg, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. COOK, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1999 Ohio 240, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillyer-v-state-farm-ins-co-ohio-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack