Hillyer v. Great Am. Ins.

Ohio Supreme Court

Hillyer v. Great Am. Ins.

706 N.E.2d 785, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1402, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 561

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 1, 1999

Docket97-2200

StatusPublished

This text of 706 N.E.2d 785 (Hillyer v. Great Am. Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hillyer v. Great Am. Ins., 706 N.E.2d 785, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1402, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 561 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Lake App. No. 96-L-148. This cause is pending as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lake County. On February 11, 1999, amicus curiae Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers filed a “Notice of Supplemental Authority.” Under S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(7), a party who intends to rely during oral argument on authorities not cited in the merit briefs may file a list of citations to those authorities no fewer than seven days before oral argument. Whereas the Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers is not a party in this cause and, whereas its notice of supplemental authority contains more than the list of citations to additional authorities permitted by S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(7),

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the notice of supplemental authority be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lake App. No. 96-L-148. This cause is pending as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lake County. On February 11, 1999, amicus curiae Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers filed a “Notice of Supplemental Authority.” Under S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(7), a party who intends to rely during oral argument on authorities not cited in the merit briefs may file a list of citations to those authorities no fewer than seven days before oral argument. Whereas the Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers is not a party in this cause and, whereas its notice of supplemental authority contains more than the list of citations to additional authorities permitted by S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(7),

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the notice of supplemental authority be, and hereby is, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

706 N.E.2d 785, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1402, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillyer-v-great-am-ins-ohio-1999.