Hillyard v. Seamons

1 Root 89
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided March 15, 1784·Published

Opinion

PetitioN for a new trial. In this case it was determined by tbe court — That the new evidence, must be particularly set forth, and the names of the witnesses; or they may not he admitted, except it he, to the same point, to which others named, are adduced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hillyard v. Seamons, 1 Root 89 (Colo. Ct. App. 1784).

1 Root 89 (Hillyard v. Seamons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.