Hillyard v. Seamons

1 Root 89
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1784
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 89 (Hillyard v. Seamons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hillyard v. Seamons, 1 Root 89 (Colo. Ct. App. 1784).

Opinion

PetitioN for a new trial. In this case it was determined by tbe court — That the new evidence, must be particularly set forth, and the names of the witnesses; or they may not he admitted, except it he, to the same point, to which others named, are adduced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Root 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillyard-v-seamons-connsuperct-1784.