Hillyard v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. Of Hartford, Conn

198 F.2d 606, 91 U.S. App. D.C. 206, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3217
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided July 31, 1952·No. 11154_1·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment for the defendant (appellee) in a suit upon an insurance policy for losses allegedly sustained by interruption to plaintiffs’ (appellants’) business caused from fire damage. The issues formed by the pleadings and pretrial order involved alleged noncompliance by plaintiffs with certain conditions of the insurance policy. The case was tried without a jury. The court found in favor of defendant and entered judgment accordingly.

We think there was ample evidence to support the court’s findings and that its conclusions were correct. We find no prejudicial error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hillyard v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. Of Hartford, Conn, 198 F.2d 606, 91 U.S. App. D.C. 206, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3217 (D.C. Cir. 1952).

198 F.2d 606 (Hillyard v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. Of Hartford, Conn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related