Hillview Ranch Associates v. J & J Estates, Inc.
This text of 247 A.D.2d 585 (Hillview Ranch Associates v. J & J Estates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In two actions to quiet title, the plaintiff in Action No. 1 appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), dated October 7, 1996, as denied its motion, brought as successor in interest to the defendants in Action No. 2, to vacate a default judgment of the same court (Hurowitz, J.), dated March 11, 1983, in Action No. 2, upon the failure of the defendants in Action No. 2 to answer and appear, which quieted title in the plaintiff in Action No. 2, Roman Blum.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The jurisdictional argument regarding service of process by publication, advanced by the appellant in support of vacating the judgment entered in Action No. 2 upon the failure of the defendants in that action to answer and appear, is unpreserved for appellate review (see, Gordon v Patchogue Surgical Co., 222 AD2d 651).
The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 A.D.2d 585, 668 N.Y.S.2d 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillview-ranch-associates-v-j-j-estates-inc-nyappdiv-1998.