Hilltop Village Cooperative No. 4, Inc. v. Kessler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hilltop Village Cooperative No. 4, Inc. v. Kessler

2 A.D.2d 708, 153 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4865

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 708 (Hilltop Village Cooperative No. 4, Inc. v. Kessler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hilltop Village Cooperative No. 4, Inc. v. Kessler, 2 A.D.2d 708, 153 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by the owner of certain buildings against the general contractor, a copartnership, to recover damages arising from the alleged breach of their building construction contract and against certain of the individual appellants to recover on a bond given by them for the performance of said contract, the complaint alleges that the individuals comprising the copartnership caused the respondent to be organized. The appeal is from an order denying appellants’ motion to strike out as irrelevant that allegation and others concerning the organic relationship between the parties. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by the owner of certain buildings against the general contractor, a copartnership, to recover damages arising from the alleged breach of their building construction contract and against certain of the individual appellants to recover on a bond given by them for the performance of said contract, the complaint alleges that the individuals comprising the copartnership caused the respondent to be organized. The appeal is from an order denying appellants’ motion to strike out as irrelevant that allegation and others concerning the organic relationship between the parties. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 708, 153 N.Y.S.2d 605, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilltop-village-cooperative-no-4-inc-v-kessler-nyappdiv-1956.