Hilltop Apartments, Inc. v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hilltop Apartments, Inc. v. City of Atlanta

116 S.E.2d 233, 216 Ga. 275, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 446

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 8, 1960

Docket20968

StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E.2d 233 (Hilltop Apartments, Inc. v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hilltop Apartments, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 116 S.E.2d 233, 216 Ga. 275, 1960 Ga. LEXIS 446 (Ga. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Almand, Justice.

The sole assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is to the order of the trial judge reciting that, “after hearing evidence and argument of counsel,” the petitioner’s application for an interlocutory injunction was denied. The [276]*276bill of exceptions states that the order was entered after hearing evidence and argument of counsel.

Argued July 12, 1960 Decided September 8, 1960. Moreton Rolleston, Jr., for plaintiff in error. J. C. Savage, Newell Edenfield, J. C. Murphy, contra.

The evidence adduced at the trial is neither set out in the bill of exceptions nor attached thereto as an exhibit nor included in the record. Without such evidence this court cannot determine whether the trial court erred or abused its discretion in refusing an interlocutory injunction and its judgment will be affirmed. Voyles v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia, 173 Ga. 844 (162 S. E. 106); Dozier v. Dozier, 194 Ga. 268 (21 S. E. 2d 655).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI