Hillsman v. Wheeler Correctional Facility
Opinion
FILED | ay
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU 18 PH 2h FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA DUBLIN DIVISION □□ a. set OF EA. RAKEIM JAQUIN HILLSMAN, ) Plaintiff, V. CV 320-029 WHEELER CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; CORE CIVIC; VANCE LAUGHIN; ) PITTMAN HERMAN; GABNALLE GRIE;_ ) and JENNY WILLIAM, ) Defendants.
ORDER
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DENIES Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. no. 2), and DISMISSES this action without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this lawsuit, he must initiate a new lawsuit, which would require submission of a new complaint. See Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 123 6 (11th Cir. 2002). SO ORDERED this ep of May, 2020, at Atjeusta, Georgia, hhh Va: Co UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hillsman v. Wheeler Correctional Facility (Hillsman v. Wheeler Correctional Facility) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.