Hillsley Realty Corp. v. Vroman
218 A.D. 855
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1926·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Alternative mandamus order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The board of appeals had no function in this matter, and mandamus appears to be the proper remedy. Present — Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hillsley Realty Corp. v. Vroman, 218 A.D. 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).
218 A.D. 855 (Hillsley Realty Corp. v. Vroman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fox Meadow Estates, Inc. v. Livingston
137 Misc. 22 (New York Supreme Court, 1930)