Hillsley Realty Corp. v. Vroman
218 A.D. 855
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 218 A.D. 855 (Hillsley Realty Corp. v. Vroman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hillsley Realty Corp. v. Vroman, 218 A.D. 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).
Opinion
Alternative mandamus order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The board of appeals had no function in this matter, and mandamus appears to be the proper remedy. Present — Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fox Meadow Estates, Inc. v. Livingston
137 Misc. 22 (New York Supreme Court, 1930)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
218 A.D. 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillsley-realty-corp-v-vroman-nyappdiv-1926.