Hillside, C., Ass'n v. Bd. Pub. Util. Commrs.

147 A. 910, 106 N.J.L. 243, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 171
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 14, 1929·Published

Opinion

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, KALISCH, LLOYD, BODINE, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 10.

For reversal — PARKER, CASE, JJ. 2. *Page 244

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hillside, C., Ass'n v. Bd. Pub. Util. Commrs., 147 A. 910, 106 N.J.L. 243, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 171 (N.J. 1929).

147 A. 910 (Hillside, C., Ass'n v. Bd. Pub. Util. Commrs.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.