Hillsborough County v. Hartzell

Supreme Court of Florida

Hillsborough County v. Hartzell

163 So. 926, 121 Fla. 353, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1581

DecidedAugust 29, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 163 So. 926 (Hillsborough County v. Hartzell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hillsborough County v. Hartzell, 163 So. 926, 121 Fla. 353, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1581 (Fla. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

In this case the same legal questions and principles of law are involved which were involved and determined by this Court in the case of Hillsborough County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., v. John F. DeSear and Mary DeSear, his wife. Therefore, the decree appealed from in this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in that case, filed July 1, 1935.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

In this case the same legal questions and principles of law are involved which were involved and determined by this Court in the case of Hillsborough County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., v. John F. DeSear and Mary DeSear, his wife. Therefore, the decree appealed from in this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in that case, filed July 1, 1935.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 So. 926, 121 Fla. 353, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillsborough-county-v-hartzell-fla-1935.