Hillsborough County v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Florida

Hillsborough County v. Bennett

173 So. 2d 688, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3403

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 7, 1965·No. No. 34057·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon certified question under Rule 4.6, F.A.R., 31 F.S.A., from the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, Florida and on briefs of counsel for the respective parties and it appearing that the question certified does not meet the prerequisites of Rule 4.61, F.A.R. as interpreted in prior decisions of this Court, it is ordered that answer to the certified question be and the same is hereby declined. See: Dade County v. Philbrick, 162 So.2d 266, and special concurring opinion of Justice Hobson in State Road Department v. Forehand, 56 So.2d 901.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon certified question under Rule 4.6, F.A.R., 31 F.S.A., from the Circuit Court of Hillsborough County, Florida and on briefs of counsel for the respective parties and it appearing that the question certified does not meet the prerequisites of Rule 4.61, F.A.R. as interpreted in prior decisions of this Court, it is ordered that answer to the certified question be and the same is hereby declined. See: Dade County v. Philbrick, 162 So.2d 266, and special concurring opinion of Justice Hobson in State Road Department v. Forehand, 56 So.2d 901.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Hillsborough County v. Bennett, 173 So. 2d 688, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3403 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

173 So. 2d 688 (Hillsborough County v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related