Hills v. Metzenroth
This text of 53 N.E. 890 (Hills v. Metzenroth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The findings of the judge were well warranted by the evidence stated in the report.
It being established by the findings that the original grantors of the lots into which the tract was divided inserted language in all of the various deeds intended to create restrictions upon the land for the benefit of all the grantees as a part of a general scheme of improvement, the plaintiff can maintain his bill in equity to prevent a violation of the restrictions. Whitney v. Union Railway, 11 Gray, 359. Parker v. Nightingale, 6 Allen, 341. Jeffries v. Jeffries, 117 Mass. 184. Sanborn v. Rice, 129 Mass. 387. Payson v. Burnham, 141 Mass. 547. Nano v. Bigelow, 155 Mass. 341. Decree for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 N.E. 890, 173 Mass. 423, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 1109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hills-v-metzenroth-mass-1899.