Hillock v. Bade

Arizona Supreme Court

Hillock v. Bade

535 P.2d 1302, 111 Ariz. 585, 1975 Ariz. LEXIS 291

Arizona Supreme Court·Decided June 2, 1975·No. 11668-PR·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this matter, the Court of Appeals, see 22 Ariz.App. 46, 523 P.2d 97 (1974), held in an extensive written opinion that the action of the Pima County Assessor, pursuant to a county three-year cyclical, re-evaluation plan was constitutional under Article 9, § 1, of the Arizona Constitution, A. R.S. We accepted review to examine into the question.

Our conclusions are in accord with those expressed in the Court of Appeals opinion. The opinion is approved and judgment is ordered in favor of the appellees, cross-appellants as directed therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this matter, the Court of Appeals, see 22 Ariz.App. 46, 523 P.2d 97 (1974), held in an extensive written opinion that the action of the Pima County Assessor, pursuant to a county three-year cyclical, re-evaluation plan was constitutional under Article 9, § 1, of the Arizona Constitution, A. R.S. We accepted review to examine into the question.

Our conclusions are in accord with those expressed in the Court of Appeals opinion. The opinion is approved and judgment is ordered in favor of the appellees, cross-appellants as directed therein.

Hillock v. Bade, 535 P.2d 1302, 111 Ariz. 585, 1975 Ariz. LEXIS 291 (Ark. 1975).

Pincite

535 P.2d 1302 (Hillock v. Bade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related