Hillock v. Bade

Arizona Supreme Court

Hillock v. Bade

535 P.2d 1302, 111 Ariz. 585, 1975 Ariz. LEXIS 291

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedJune 2, 1975

Docket11668-PR

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 535 P.2d 1302 (Hillock v. Bade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hillock v. Bade, 535 P.2d 1302, 111 Ariz. 585, 1975 Ariz. LEXIS 291 (Ark. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this matter, the Court of Appeals, see 22 Ariz.App. 46, 523 P.2d 97 (1974), held in an extensive written opinion that the action of the Pima County Assessor, pursuant to a county three-year cyclical, re-evaluation plan was constitutional under Article 9, § 1, of the Arizona Constitution, A. R.S. We accepted review to examine into the question.

Our conclusions are in accord with those expressed in the Court of Appeals opinion. The opinion is approved and judgment is ordered in favor of the appellees, cross-appellants as directed therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this matter, the Court of Appeals, see 22 Ariz.App. 46, 523 P.2d 97 (1974), held in an extensive written opinion that the action of the Pima County Assessor, pursuant to a county three-year cyclical, re-evaluation plan was constitutional under Article 9, § 1, of the Arizona Constitution, A. R.S. We accepted review to examine into the question.

Our conclusions are in accord with those expressed in the Court of Appeals opinion. The opinion is approved and judgment is ordered in favor of the appellees, cross-appellants as directed therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

535 P.2d 1302, 111 Ariz. 585, 1975 Ariz. LEXIS 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillock-v-bade-ariz-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack