Hillmer v. Board of Adjustment, City of Laramie

Wyoming Supreme Court

Hillmer v. Board of Adjustment, City of Laramie

414 P.2d 975, 1966 Wyo. LEXIS 145

CourtWyoming Supreme Court

DecidedJune 2, 1966

DocketNo. 3475

StatusPublished

This text of 414 P.2d 975 (Hillmer v. Board of Adjustment, City of Laramie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hillmer v. Board of Adjustment, City of Laramie, 414 P.2d 975, 1966 Wyo. LEXIS 145 (Wyo. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to Case No. 3473, Hillmer v. McConnell, Wyo., 414 P.2d 972. The action in Case No. 3473 was for the abatement of a nuisance, it being claimed by Norval Hillmer and his wife that a rabbit processing plant operated by McConnell Brothers was a nuisance.

The proceedings in this case (No. 3475) involve an appeal taken to the Board of Adjustment, City of Laramie, Wyoming, from the refusal of the City Manager of Laramie to give notice to McConnell Brothers to discontinue the operation of its plant. Relief to the Hillmers was denied by the Board of Adjustment, after which an appeal was taken to the district court of Albany County where judgment was entered confirming the Board of Adjustment’s decision. The judgment of the district court is the subject matter of the appeal in this case (No. 3475).

In their proceedings before the Board of Adjustment Hillmers have sought substantially the same relief sought in the injunction action, except that no claim for damages was involved. Our decision in the injunction case (No. 3473), which is being handed down at this time, renders moot all questions involved in the instant appeal, and no further opinion is necessary for this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to Case No. 3473, Hillmer v. McConnell, Wyo., 414 P.2d 972. The action in Case No. 3473 was for the abatement of a nuisance, it being claimed by Norval Hillmer and his wife that a rabbit processing plant operated by McConnell Brothers was a nuisance.

The proceedings in this case (No. 3475) involve an appeal taken to the Board of Adjustment, City of Laramie, Wyoming, from the refusal of the City Manager of Laramie to give notice to McConnell Brothers to discontinue the operation of its plant. Relief to the Hillmers was denied by the Board of Adjustment, after which an appeal was taken to the district court of Albany County where judgment was entered confirming the Board of Adjustment’s decision. The judgment of the district court is the subject matter of the appeal in this case (No. 3475).

In their proceedings before the Board of Adjustment Hillmers have sought substantially the same relief sought in the injunction action, except that no claim for damages was involved. Our decision in the injunction case (No. 3473), which is being handed down at this time, renders moot all questions involved in the instant appeal, and no further opinion is necessary for this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

414 P.2d 975, 1966 Wyo. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillmer-v-board-of-adjustment-city-of-laramie-wyo-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack