Hillman v. Florida

Supreme Court

Hillman v. Florida

392 U.S. 307, 88 S. Ct. 2065, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1114, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1368

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 10, 1968

DocketNo. 443

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 392 U.S. 307 (Hillman v. Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hillman v. Florida, 392 U.S. 307, 88 S. Ct. 2065, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1114, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1368 (1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

392 U.S. 307, 88 S. Ct. 2065, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1114, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillman-v-florida-scotus-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack