Hillman v. Farmers State Bank

146 S.E. 761, 167 Ga. 782, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 34
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 17, 1929
DocketNo. 6448
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 146 S.E. 761 (Hillman v. Farmers State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hillman v. Farmers State Bank, 146 S.E. 761, 167 Ga. 782, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 34 (Ga. 1929).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The bill of exceptions in this case relates to the same trial as the case in Bank of Lumpkin v. Farmers State Bank, ante.

1. The charge upon which error is assigned in the fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth grounds of the motion for new trial stated correct principles of law applicable to the pleadings and evidence, and was not erroneous for any of the reasons assigned.

2. Upon all other assignments of error the case is controlled by the rulings in Bank of Lumpkin v. Farmers State Bank, supra.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Bussell, G. J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Michael
158 S.E. 426 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 S.E. 761, 167 Ga. 782, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillman-v-farmers-state-bank-ga-1929.