Hillman v. Bunting (Slip Opinion)
This text of 2014 Ohio 5197 (Hillman v. Bunting (Slip Opinion)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 1} Appellant, Dallas Hillman, appeals the dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus. Hillman claims that because the trial court allowed him to withdraw his guilty plea after he had been convicted and sentenced based upon that plea, there is no longer a valid judgment of conviction. However, the May 23, 2012 judgment granting Hillman’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea was subsequently vacated by the court of appeals in State v. Hillman, 9th Dist. Wayne No. 12CA0028, 2013-Ohio-982, 2013 WL 1095440. We denied review of that decision. 136 Ohio St.3d 1561, 2013-Ohio-4861, 996 N.E.2d 987.
{¶2} Therefore, the original journal entry sentencing Hillman for his drug offenses is still valid. We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ohio 5197, 21 N.E.3d 1062, 141 Ohio St. 3d 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillman-v-bunting-slip-opinion-ohio-2014.