Hillman v. Bunting (Slip Opinion)

2014 Ohio 5197, 21 N.E.3d 1062, 141 Ohio St. 3d 100
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 25, 2014·No. 2014-0117·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Dallas Hillman, appeals the dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus. Hillman claims that because the trial court allowed him to withdraw his guilty plea after he had been convicted and sentenced based upon that plea, there is no longer a valid judgment of conviction. However, the May 23, 2012 judgment granting Hillman’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea was subsequently vacated by the court of appeals in State v. Hillman, 9th Dist. Wayne No. 12CA0028, 2013-Ohio-982, 2013 WL 1095440. We denied review of that decision. 136 Ohio St.3d 1561, 2013-Ohio-4861, 996 N.E.2d 987.

{¶2} Therefore, the original journal entry sentencing Hillman for his drug offenses is still valid. We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

O’ConnoR, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hillman v. Bunting (Slip Opinion), 2014 Ohio 5197, 21 N.E.3d 1062, 141 Ohio St. 3d 100 (Ohio 2014).

2014 Ohio 5197 (Hillman v. Bunting (Slip Opinion)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hillman
2013 Ohio 982 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)