Hillman v. Bunting (Slip Opinion)

2014 Ohio 5197, 21 N.E.3d 1062, 141 Ohio St. 3d 100
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 25, 2014
Docket2014-0117
StatusPublished

This text of 2014 Ohio 5197 (Hillman v. Bunting (Slip Opinion)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hillman v. Bunting (Slip Opinion), 2014 Ohio 5197, 21 N.E.3d 1062, 141 Ohio St. 3d 100 (Ohio 2014).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Dallas Hillman, appeals the dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus. Hillman claims that because the trial court allowed him to withdraw his guilty plea after he had been convicted and sentenced based upon that plea, there is no longer a valid judgment of conviction. However, the May 23, 2012 judgment granting Hillman’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea was subsequently vacated by the court of appeals in State v. Hillman, 9th Dist. Wayne No. 12CA0028, 2013-Ohio-982, 2013 WL 1095440. We denied review of that decision. 136 Ohio St.3d 1561, 2013-Ohio-4861, 996 N.E.2d 987.

{¶2} Therefore, the original journal entry sentencing Hillman for his drug offenses is still valid. We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

O’ConnoR, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hillman
2013 Ohio 982 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ohio 5197, 21 N.E.3d 1062, 141 Ohio St. 3d 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillman-v-bunting-slip-opinion-ohio-2014.