Hilligoss v. North Anderson Gas Co.
This text of 51 N.E. 243 (Hilligoss v. North Anderson Gas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this cause we are asked to set aside the verdict of a jury, and hold that the trial court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial upon the sole ground that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence. The evidence is properly before us. The verdict of the jury is not without some evidence to sustain it, and under the rule adopted by both this court and the Supreme Court of this State, the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 N.E. 243, 20 Ind. App. 707, 1898 Ind. App. LEXIS 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilligoss-v-north-anderson-gas-co-indctapp-1898.