Hilliard v. Wainwright
This text of Hilliard v. Wainwright (Hilliard v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) ARLYN RODRICQUEZ HILLIARD, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10-1553 (ABJ) ) UNITED STATES PAROLE ) COMMISSION, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ____________________________________)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The respondents have filed a timely response to petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas
corpus. See United States’ Response to Petition for Habeas Corpus, Docket No. 9. On May 6,
2011, the Court ordered petitioner to reply to the response on or before June 10, 2011, warning
that if petitioner failed to file such a reply, on time, “the Court will treat the assertions stated in
the opposition as conceded, summarily deny the petition, and dismiss the case.” To date,
petitioner has not filed a reply. Therefore the Court will treat the assertions stated in
respondent’s response as conceded, summarily deny the petition, and dismiss this case.
A separate order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion shall issue this date.
AMY BERMAN JACKSON United States District Judge
DATE: July 29, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hilliard v. Wainwright, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilliard-v-wainwright-dcd-2011.