Hilliard v. Veneman

Fourth Circuit

Hilliard v. Veneman

170 F. App'x 265

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 24, 2006·No. No. 05-1745·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joe Hilliard appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failure to comply with the court’s order. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93 (4th Cir.1989). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hilliard v. Veneman, No. CA-04-22431-5 (D.S.C. June 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Joe Hilliard appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failure to comply with the court’s order. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See Ballard v. Carlson, 882 F.2d 93 (4th Cir.1989). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hilliard v. Veneman, No. CA-04-22431-5 (D.S.C. June 14, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hilliard v. Veneman, 170 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

170 F. App'x 265 (Hilliard v. Veneman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.