Hilliard v. Sterlingworth Railway Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Hilliard v. Sterlingworth Railway Supply Co.

73 A. 191, 224 Pa. 132, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 741

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 15, 1909

DocketAppeal, No. 327

StatusPublished

This text of 73 A. 191 (Hilliard v. Sterlingworth Railway Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hilliard v. Sterlingworth Railway Supply Co., 73 A. 191, 224 Pa. 132, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 741 (Pa. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam,

We have concluded after due consideration that this is an appeal from an interlocutory order, and under our decisions must be quashed. The order of sale, heretofore made and from which this appeal was taken is necessarily expended and cannot now be executed. If an alias order of sale be applied for an opportunity will be given by the court in banc for the interested parties to be heard so that the propriety as well as the necessity of renewing the order at this time may be determined. Such order of sale, or other decree, can then be made as will best protect and conserve the interests of all parties concerned under present conditions.

Motion to quash sustained and appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam,

We have concluded after due consideration that this is an appeal from an interlocutory order, and under our decisions must be quashed. The order of sale, heretofore made and from which this appeal was taken is necessarily expended and cannot now be executed. If an alias order of sale be applied for an opportunity will be given by the court in banc for the interested parties to be heard so that the propriety as well as the necessity of renewing the order at this time may be determined. Such order of sale, or other decree, can then be made as will best protect and conserve the interests of all parties concerned under present conditions.

Motion to quash sustained and appeal quashed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 A. 191, 224 Pa. 132, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilliard-v-sterlingworth-railway-supply-co-pa-1909.