Hilliard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Hilliard v. State

71 S.W.2d 1114, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 940

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 30, 1934

DocketNo. 16864

StatusPublished

This text of 71 S.W.2d 1114 (Hilliard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hilliard v. State, 71 S.W.2d 1114, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 940 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The facts heard before the trial court are not brought up for review.

There are alleged irregularities upon which appellant relies for a reversal, which cannot be appraised in the absence of the facts from which they arise.

Nothing demanding or authorizing a reversal appearing in the record, this court has no choice other than to affirm the judgment, which is accordingly ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The facts heard before the trial court are not brought up for review.

There are alleged irregularities upon which appellant relies for a reversal, which cannot be appraised in the absence of the facts from which they arise.

Nothing demanding or authorizing a reversal appearing in the record, this court has no choice other than to affirm the judgment, which is accordingly ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 S.W.2d 1114, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilliard-v-state-texcrimapp-1934.