Hilliard v. State
This text of 37 Tex. 358 (Hilliard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court erred in excluding the plea of former acquittal from the jury, and also in the first clause of the charge.
A defendant, if convicted at all, must be convicted of the offense charged in the indictment. This charge instructed the jury to find the defendant guilty, if, at any time within six months prior to the finding of the indictment, he did have and carry, on or about his person, a pistol.
It is easy to conceive that the defendant might have had upon his person a pistol within the time specified, and have yet committed no breach of the law.
The court should explain to the jury all the ingredients of an act which makes it an offense against the law; otherwise an innocent man might be found guilty, and indeed could have no defense against acts innocent in themselves.
The Legislature undoubtedly intended to give justices jurisdiction of the offense charged in this indictment. (Vol. II., Paschal’s Digest, 6517.)
The judgment of the District Court is reversed and the cause dismissed.
Reversed and dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
37 Tex. 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilliard-v-state-tex-1873.