Hilliard v. Merit Systems Protection Board
This text of Hilliard v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Hilliard v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
TERESA L. HILLIARD, Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. ____________________
2011-3198 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DC0752100451-I-3. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JOHNNIE ALLEN LANDON, JR., of Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.
JEFFREY A. GAUGER, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were JAMES M. EISENMANN, General Counsel, and KEISHA DAWN BELL, Deputy General Counsel. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LINN, PLAGER, and DYK, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 13, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hilliard v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilliard-v-merit-systems-protection-board-cafc-2012.