Hilliard v. Chew

76 Miss. 763
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 76 Miss. 763 (Hilliard v. Chew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hilliard v. Chew, 76 Miss. 763 (Mich. 1899).

Opinion

Terral, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

On the twelfth of August, 1895, at Clarksdale, in the fourth district for the election of justices of the peace of Coahoma county, before a justice of the peace thereof, a judgment was rendered in an action of assumpsit in favor of H. E. Hilliard against George Chew for §195.63. The judgment was rendered by default upon personal service. George Chew, at [766]*766the time of the bringing of the suit and of the judgment, was a resident householder and freeholder of district number five of said county, where the debt was contracted, and where there was an acting justice of the peace qualified to try the suit.

Execution, issued upon the judgment, was levied upon seven1 bales of cotton as thé property of Chew, when he filed his bill herein and obtained a perpetual injunction against the enforcement of the judgment.

As the justice of the peace of district number four did not acquire jurisdiction of the cause of action between the parties, the judgment against Chew was void, and the decree giving him a perpetual injunction against it is approved.-

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Catlett v. Drummond
74 So. 323 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Miss. 763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilliard-v-chew-miss-1899.