Hilley v. Perrin

59 S.E. 342, 3 Ga. App. 143, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 578
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 25, 1907
Docket647
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 59 S.E. 342 (Hilley v. Perrin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hilley v. Perrin, 59 S.E. 342, 3 Ga. App. 143, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 578 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. Exceptions pendente lite, though filed and recorded under order of the judge, can not be considered unless duly certified to be true. Civil Code, §5541; Binyard v. State, 126 Ga. 635 (55 S. E. 498).

2. Distress warrant lies in favor of a landlord against a tenant for the recovery of any rent due the former by the latter. This is true although the landlord, subsequent to the time the rent becomes due, takes a note for the rent. The character of the indebtedness is not changed by the taking of the note. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Metalcraft Engineering Corp. v. Moses
84 S.E.2d 125 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Middle Georgia Lumber Co. v. Hunt
186 S.E. 714 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Brooks v. Jackins
142 S.E. 574 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 S.E. 342, 3 Ga. App. 143, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilley-v-perrin-gactapp-1907.