Hilley v. Mabus
This text of Hilley v. Mabus (Hilley v. Mabus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2121
LANCE M. HILLEY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
RAYMOND E. MABUS, Secretary of the Navy,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00457-JBF-FBS)
Submitted: June 21, 2010 Decided: July 6, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lance M. Hilley, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Lance M. Hilley appeals the district court’s judgment
denying Hilley’s summary judgment motion and granting
Defendant’s motion to dismiss and for summary judgment on
Hilley’s “mixed case” seeking review of a Merit Systems
Protection Board decision, and disability discrimination claims
under the American with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A.
§§ 12101-12213 (West 2005 & Supp. 2010), and the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701-796l (West 2008
& Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
judgment. See Hilley v. Mabus, No. 2:08-cv-00457-JBF-FBS (E.D.
Va. July 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hilley v. Mabus, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilley-v-mabus-ca4-2010.