Hilley v. Hilley

405 So. 2d 711, 1981 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1318
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hilley v. Hilley. Read the opinion of the Court — 1980 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1105
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama·Decided September 30, 1981·No. Civ. 2256·Published

Opinion

HOLMES, Judge.

The prior opinion of this court, Ala. Civ.App. 405 So.2d 704, has been affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to this court for further proceedings. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion of August 21, 1981, Ala., 405 So.2d 708, this cause is now affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for entry of a judgment not inconsistent with the opinion of the supreme court.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED FOR ENTRY OF A JUDGMENT NOT INCONSISTENT WITH THE OPINION OF THE SUPREME COURT.

WRIGHT, P. J., and BRADLEY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hilley v. Hilley, 405 So. 2d 711, 1981 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 1318 (Ala. Ct. App. 1981).

405 So. 2d 711 (Hilley v. Hilley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ex Parte Hilley
405 So. 2d 708 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1981)