Hilley v. Hale

93 S.E. 225, 20 Ga. App. 603, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 991
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 25, 1917
Docket8334
StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.E. 225 (Hilley v. Hale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hilley v. Hale, 93 S.E. 225, 20 Ga. App. 603, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 991 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence in this case demanded a verdict in favor of the defendant, and it was error for the judge of the superior court to overrule the certiorari.

Judgment reversed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur. A. L. Henson, for plaintiff in error. G. A. Coffee, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 225, 20 Ga. App. 603, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilley-v-hale-gactapp-1917.