Hillesheim v. Wood Dale Nursing Home, Inc.

771 N.W.2d 513, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 584, 2009 WL 2781315
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedSeptember 1, 2009
DocketA09-839
StatusPublished

This text of 771 N.W.2d 513 (Hillesheim v. Wood Dale Nursing Home, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hillesheim v. Wood Dale Nursing Home, Inc., 771 N.W.2d 513, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 584, 2009 WL 2781315 (Mich. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 14, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary af-firmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
771 N.W.2d 513, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 584, 2009 WL 2781315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillesheim-v-wood-dale-nursing-home-inc-minn-2009.