Hillery v. State
This text of 557 So. 2d 964 (Hillery v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Benjamin Hillery appeals the trial judge’s refusal to grant his motion for judgment of acquittal and the court's imposition of costs without notice. We find that the identity of the defendant was adequately established to make a prima facie case and affirm the court’s denial of the motion for judgment of acquittal.
The State concedes that costs were imposed without notice and an opportunity to be heard.1 The costs judgment must therefore be reversed under the authority of Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988).
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
557 So. 2d 964, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1578, 1990 WL 26955, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillery-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.