Hillert v. Hillert

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hillert v. Hillert

821 So. 2d 1188, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10333, 2002 WL 1625593

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 24, 2002

DocketNo. 4D01-3263

StatusPublished

This text of 821 So. 2d 1188 (Hillert v. Hillert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hillert v. Hillert, 821 So. 2d 1188, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10333, 2002 WL 1625593 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING, REHEARING EN BANC & CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion for rehearing and, in so doing, vacate our May 29, 2002 order, wherein we indicated that the appeal of the order of contempt entered on May 1, 2001, was untimely. After careful consideration, both the May 1, 2001 order holding the wife in contempt and the July 17, 2001 order granting attorney’s fees are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

STEVENSON, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING, REHEARING EN BANC & CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion for rehearing and, in so doing, vacate our May 29, 2002 order, wherein we indicated that the appeal of the order of contempt entered on May 1, 2001, was untimely. After careful consideration, both the May 1, 2001 order holding the wife in contempt and the July 17, 2001 order granting attorney’s fees are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

STEVENSON, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

821 So. 2d 1188, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10333, 2002 WL 1625593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillert-v-hillert-fladistctapp-2002.