Hiller v. Barnhart

Seventh Circuit

Hiller v. Barnhart

96 F. App'x 413

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedApril 21, 2004

DocketNo. 03-2842

StatusPublished

This text of 96 F. App'x 413 (Hiller v. Barnhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hiller v. Barnhart, 96 F. App'x 413 (7th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

An administrative law judge determined that Phillip Hiller’s shoulder, knee, and back impairments do not render him disabled. The Appeals Council declined to review that decision. The district court concluded that the administrative decision is supported by substantial evidence and uninfluenced by any legal error. After receiving briefs and hearing oral argument, we conclude that the district court’s evaluation of this litigation requires no elaboration. Accordingly, for substantially the reasons the district court gave, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

An administrative law judge determined that Phillip Hiller’s shoulder, knee, and back impairments do not render him disabled. The Appeals Council declined to review that decision. The district court concluded that the administrative decision is supported by substantial evidence and uninfluenced by any legal error. After receiving briefs and hearing oral argument, we conclude that the district court’s evaluation of this litigation requires no elaboration. Accordingly, for substantially the reasons the district court gave, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 F. App'x 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hiller-v-barnhart-ca7-2004.