Hillenberg v. Bendick
164 A.D. 897
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1914
StatusPublished
This text of 164 A.D. 897 (Hillenberg v. Bendick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hillenberg v. Bendick, 164 A.D. 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).
Opinion
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, on the authority of Havana City Railway Co. v. Ceballos (49 App. Div. 431). The rule in Mellen v. Athens Hotel Co. (149 App. Div. 534) may not be applied to the case under review. Burr, Thomas, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cornell v. Savage
49 A.D. 429 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Mellen v. Athens Hotel Co.
149 A.D. 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
164 A.D. 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hillenberg-v-bendick-nyappdiv-1914.