Hilldale Estates Sewerage Disposal Corp. v. Town of Carmel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hilldale Estates Sewerage Disposal Corp. v. Town of Carmel

69 A.D.2d 897, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11642

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 69 A.D.2d 897 (Hilldale Estates Sewerage Disposal Corp. v. Town of Carmel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hilldale Estates Sewerage Disposal Corp. v. Town of Carmel, 69 A.D.2d 897, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11642 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review the sewer rate set by the respondent town board, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated July 25, 1978, which, inter alia, determined that the actions of the town board in setting the rate were not arbitrary or capricious. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements payable to respondents-respondents. We do not agree with the statement of Special Term that the petitioner could maintain a civil suit against the individual property owners. Suozzi, J. P., Lazer, Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review the sewer rate set by the respondent town board, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated July 25, 1978, which, inter alia, determined that the actions of the town board in setting the rate were not arbitrary or capricious. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements payable to respondents-respondents. We do not agree with the statement of Special Term that the petitioner could maintain a civil suit against the individual property owners. Suozzi, J. P., Lazer, Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 A.D.2d 897, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hilldale-estates-sewerage-disposal-corp-v-town-of-carmel-nyappdiv-1979.